Prediction of Kimiko Date Krumm vs Amanda Coetzer Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Date Krumm vs A. Coetzer

Kimiko Date Krumm
JPN
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
55
Age
54
-
Height
1.58m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
4
Best Rank
12
5
Total Titles
9
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Amanda Coetzer
RSA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
3
Played
2
Win
55
Age
54
-
Height
1.58m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
4
Best Rank
12
5
Total Titles
9
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Krumm 1 - 2 Coetzer
They have played 6 sets in total, with Kimiko Date Krumm winning 2 and Amanda Coetzer winning 4. The last match between Kimiko Date Krumm and Amanda Coetzer was at the Tokyo, 16-09-1996, Round: , Surface: Hard, with Kimiko Date Krumm getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krumm | 1 |
| Coetzer | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
() Tokyo(09-16-96)
Kimiko Date Krumm
6
6
Amanda Coetzer
3
0
(R1) Roland Garros(05-23-94)
Amanda Coetzer
6
6
Kimiko Date Krumm
2
1
(F) Tokyo Nichirei(09-21-93)
Amanda Coetzer
6
6
Kimiko Date Krumm
3
2
K. D. Krumm vs A. Coetzer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 70.75% (237-98) | Career Total W/L | 62.88% (576-340) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. D. Krumm vs A. Coetzer Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kimiko Date Krumm has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Amanda Coetzer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kimiko Date Krumm, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amanda Coetzer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kimiko Date Krumm has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amanda Coetzer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kimiko Date Krumm has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Amanda Coetzer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kimiko Date Krumm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 107/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 13/8). Amanda Coetzer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 196/89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 15/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Kimiko Date Krumm has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Amanda Coetzer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Kimiko Date Krumm winning 1 times and Amanda Coetzer being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Kimiko Date Krumm winning 2 and Amanda Coetzer winning 4.
- The last match between Kimiko Date Krumm and Amanda Coetzer was at the Tokyo, 16-09-1996, Round: , Surface: Hard, with Kimiko Date Krumm getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kimiko Date Krumm has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Amanda Coetzer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kimiko Date Krumm has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amanda Coetzer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kimiko Date Krumm has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amanda Coetzer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kimiko Date Krumm vs Amanda Coetzer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. D. Krumm vs A. Coetzer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 20 | Games Won | 27 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Krumm 0%, Coetzer 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Krumm 0%, Coetzer 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Krumm 0%, Coetzer 0%.
K. D. Krumm Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
L | 6-1 6-2 | |||
R4 | W | 5-4 RET | ||
W | 6-3 6-0 | |||
R4 | W | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | ||
A. Coetzer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | ||

K. D. Krumm vs A. Coetzer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.75% (237/98) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.88% (576/340) |
| 65.54% (504/265) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.94% (1248/834) |
| 56.47% (3940/3037) | Games Win/Loss | 54.13% (10200/8645) |
| 75.35% (107/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.90% (269/152) |
| 70.91% (39/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.77% (196/89) |
| 59.46% (22/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.49% (69/60) |
| 61.90% (13/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 0 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 254.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.38 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 69% (404/583) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (242/404) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (89/179) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (33/67) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 45% (271/597) |
| 67.50% (27/13) | Slam W/L | 64.17% (77/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 57.14% (44/33) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Cups W/L | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 62.92% (168/99) |
| 92.86% (26/2) | Challenger W/L | 76.12% (51/16) |
| 69.62% (55/24) | Futures W/L | 55.10% (27/22) |
| 70% (234/332) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (569/907) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 65% (11/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (57/100) |
| 66% (69/104) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (157/261) |
| 93% (214/198) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (541/493) |
| 7% (214/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (541/48) |
| 31% (119/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (371/80) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tue, 25 Nov, 01:30 PM
PredictionTue, 25 Nov, 04:00 PM
PredictionTue, 25 Nov, 04:30 PM
PredictionTue, 25 Nov, 05:30 PM
PredictionTue, 25 Nov, 04:00 PM
PredictionTue, 25 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Filip Peliwo Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

23 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

23 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Jaume Antoni Munar Clar Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
19:00
H2H 0-1
13:15
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
16:00
H2H 0-0
16:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola